 |
|
2009 Buick Enclave CXL AWD
Compare the Enclave to the Tahoe
List Price: $38,440
Invoice: $35,941
|
Buick Enclave Advantages:
| Costs $9,110 Less |
| 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 3.6L) |
| Engine (8 cylinder vs. 6 Cylinder) |
| CD Changer Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1475) |
| 32 More Horsepower (320 vs. 288) |
|
| |
|
2009 Chrysler Aspen Hybrid Limited 4X4
Compare the Aspen Hybrid to the Tahoe
List Price: $44,770
|
Chrysler Aspen Hybrid Advantages:
| Costs $3,220 Less |
| DVD Player Standard |
| Third Row Seating Standard |
| 25 More Horsepower (345 vs. 320) |
| Better City Mileage (19 vs. 14) |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| CD Changer Standard |
| Child Safety Locks Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1410) |
|
| |
|
2009 Dodge Durango Hybrid Limited 4X4
Compare the Durango Hybrid to the Tahoe
List Price: $44,540
|
Dodge Durango Hybrid Advantages:
| Costs $3,450 Less |
| DVD Player Standard |
| Third Row Seating Standard |
| 25 More Horsepower (345 vs. 320) |
| Better City Mileage (19 vs. 14) |
| Roof Rack Standard |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| CD Changer Standard |
| Child Safety Locks Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1440) |
|
| |
|
2009 Ford Expedition EL King Ranch 4X4
Compare the Expedition to the Tahoe
List Price: $48,475
Invoice: $43,843
|
Ford Expedition Advantages:
| 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| Roof Rack Standard |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Costs $1,315 Less |
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| Better Highway Mileage (19 vs. 0) |
| Better City Mileage (14 vs. 0) |
|
| |
|
2009 GMC Yukon XL 4WD SLT-2 1/2 Ton
Compare the Yukon to the Tahoe
List Price: $47,615
Invoice: $43,568
|
GMC Yukon Advantages:
| 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1564) |
|
| |
|
2009 Honda Pilot Touring 4WD 5-Spd AT w/ DVD
Compare the Pilot to the Tahoe
List Price: $39,995
|
Honda Pilot Advantages:
| Costs $8,395 Less |
| 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| DVD Player Standard |
| Third Row Seating Standard |
| Sunroof/Moonroof Standard |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 3.5L) |
| Engine (8 cylinder vs. 6 Cylinder) |
| OnStar System Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1488) |
| 70 More Horsepower (320 vs. 250) |
|
| |
|
2009 Jeep Commander Overland 4X4
Compare the Commander to the Tahoe
List Price: $45,210
Invoice: $41,102
|
Jeep Commander Advantages:
| Costs $2,780 Less |
| 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| DVD Player Standard |
| 37 More Horsepower (357 vs. 320) |
| Sunroof/Moonroof Standard |
| Roof Rack Standard |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| CD Changer Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1110) |
|
| |
|
2009 Nissan Armada LE 4X4
Compare the Armada to the Tahoe
List Price: $46,780
|
Nissan Armada Advantages:
| Costs $630 Less |
| 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| Third Row Seating Standard |
| Roof Rack Standard |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1459) |
|
| |
|
2009 Saab 9-7X Aero
Compare the 9-7X to the Tahoe
List Price: $47,425
Invoice: $44,105
|
Saab 9-7X Advantages:
| Larger Engine (6.0L vs. 5.3L) |
| Sunroof/Moonroof Standard |
| Roof Rack Standard |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Costs $615 Less |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1230) |
|
| |
|
2009 Toyota 4Runner Limited 4X4 V8
Compare the 4Runner to the Tahoe
List Price: $39,360
Invoice: $35,147
|
Toyota 4Runner Advantages:
| Costs $9,130 Less |
| 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
Chevrolet Tahoe Advantages:
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Larger Engine (5.3L vs. 4.7L) |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| More Payload Capacity (1776 vs. 1475) |
| 60 More Horsepower (320 vs. 260) |
|
| |